<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Car tuning tips and mods. &#187; nasp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cartuningtips.com/category/engine/nasp/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cartuningtips.com</link>
	<description>More power and more Torque from our performance tuning mods.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 23:31:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NASP engines and tuning options.</title>
		<link>http://www.cartuningtips.com/10-nasp-engines-and-tuning-options</link>
		<comments>http://www.cartuningtips.com/10-nasp-engines-and-tuning-options#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 06:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cartuningtips.com/10-nasp-engines-and-tuning-options</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When deciding on a power train which should you go for? Both have merits. The answer really depends on driver style and preference but I will admit to being a little biased towards turbos. Here is my take on NASP Engines. &#8220;NASP Engines (Naturally Aspirated)&#8221; These engines suck in the air they need filling the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cartuningtips.com/10-nasp-engines-and-tuning-options/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
